What Is Forced Diversity, And Why Is It Controversial?

In recent years, the push for greater diversity and inclusion in the workplace and other spheres of society has gained significant momentum. Many organizations are now actively working to create more inclusive environments by addressing the underrepresentation of various social groups. However, not all attempts at fostering diversity are created equal. One problematic approach that has emerged is forced diversity, which may have unintended consequences that hinder the creation of genuinely diverse and inclusive environments.

What Is Forced Diversity?

Forced diversity occurs when organizations or institutions mandate the inclusion of individuals from diverse backgrounds based on factors such as gender, race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation, rather than organically fostering an inclusive environment. This approach often results in tokenism, where individuals are included primarily based on their diverse attributes rather than their skills and qualifications. While the intentions behind forced diversity may be well-meaning, its superficial nature can lead to a variety of harmful outcomes.

We must fight for diversity and inclusivity in our society; there is no question about that. The era of inequality, exclusivity, and oppression belongs to the past, and we must accord everyone the equal rights and representation afforded to everyone. We have made so much progress and must preserve everything we have won. 

But we must do it fair and square. Minority groups and others have been the victim of oppression; as such, we must not seek redress and right the wrong by doing what oppressive institutions have done. If we do that, we are certainly no better than them. 

We must do it the right way; identity representation, for instance, must be done appropriately and in the proper context. Failure to do so might throw accusations of forced diversity. Forced diversity is the current buzz in the entertainment world, and the controversy around it threatens to reverse some of our successes. 

Simply put, forced diversity is a kind of false representation or misrepresentation where diverse film characters are there to satisfy the need for inclusion and diversity. When you put people of colour in characters traditionally deemed white, some sectors will accuse the film of forced diversity. 

Representation is a crucial issue in art and film, but those who accuse filmmakers of forced diversity might be treading on dangerous grounds for at least two reasons. 

The Harmful Effects of Forced Diversity:

Tokenism and Stereotyping

Forced diversity can perpetuate tokenism, which occurs when individuals are included for their demographic characteristics rather than their merit or qualifications. This can lead to the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes, as individuals from marginalized groups may be seen as tokens rather than as valuable contributors to the team or organization.

Resentment and Division

When diversity is forced or perceived as such, it can breed resentment among those who feel that they have been overlooked in favor of others based on demographic characteristics, rather than qualifications or skills. This can create divisions within teams or organizations, undermining collaboration and unity.

Alienation and Disempowerment

Individuals who are included through forced diversity measures may feel alienated and disempowered, as their inclusion is based on superficial factors rather than their true abilities and potential. This can negatively impact their self-esteem, job satisfaction, and sense of belonging in the workplace.

Promoting Genuine Diversity and Inclusion

To avoid the pitfalls of forced diversity and create a truly inclusive environment, organizations should focus on genuine diversity, which values individuals for their unique perspectives, experiences, and contributions. Here are some strategies for promoting genuine diversity:

1. Encourage Open Dialogue: Create a safe space for employees to discuss their experiences and concerns related to diversity and inclusion. This fosters empathy and understanding among team members and helps to identify areas for improvement.
2. Implement Unbiased Recruitment Practices: Utilize blind resumes, diverse interview panels, and standardized interview questions to minimize bias in the hiring process. This helps ensure that candidates are evaluated based on their qualifications and skills, rather than their demographic characteristics.
3. Provide Mentorship and Development Opportunities: Offer programs and resources to support the professional growth of diverse employees and help them advance in their careers. This demonstrates a commitment to their success and ensures that they feel valued and supported within the organization.
4. Measure and Track Progress: Collect data on diversity metrics, such as the representation of different groups within the organization, and use this information to set goals and monitor progress. This helps to ensure accountability and continuous improvement in diversity and inclusion efforts.

Lessons From The Past

 The first reason is that people of color, minority groups, and marginalized sectors, such as women and the working class, were excluded from various art forms for the longest time. 

We have fought long and hard to achieve unity in diversity. 

For most of history, they are not only given minimal representation; in severe cases, some were excluded and not even represented in art forms. Looking at certain discourses, for instance, only recently do specific social categories, like women, children, and the like, have been the object of study. 

In the film industry, which is only more than a century old, only recently do marginalized groups get representation. If not for the mandatory quotas established by legislation, marginalized people would not have jobs, which could have resulted in a lack of influence in filmmaking. 

Only now do the marginalized are given the opportunity to play vital roles and characters in various art forms like movies and television. That some complained of forced diversity after centuries of oppression, injustice, and discrimination, is odd. 

The second reason concerns representation itself. The idea of forced diversity implies that there is a code of representation accepted by everyone, a code that should not be broken and needs to be maintained. 

It implies that representation is unproblematic and unchanging. Many forgot, however, in the controversy surrounding forced diversity: representation itself is historical and needs historicizing. Power structures and the ruling ideology were complicit in forming concepts on which they based their idea of representation. 

But in the fight for social justice, diversity and inclusivity, those concepts and ideas need to be deconstructed, if not destroyed. And we are on the right track in pursuing mandatory quotas for inclusivity and diversity. It turns out that who makes up the film and the crew largely determines the narrative and the politics of the film. 

Did you know that the first influential book on the history of children and childhood came out only in 1960? Before that they were rarely a topic of discussion

Therefore, the lessons of history and representation cast a long shadow on the controversy of forced diversity.

There is the lingering accusation that forced diversity happens due to the need to appease the members of the woke generation, who are the primary consumers of film and television. Be as it may, the fact remains that most minorities and marginalized are still underrepresented in film and television. 

But more than the need to appease, it is the affirmative action of members of society, more than any other, that contributes to the recognition of the need for representation. That is why others previously excluded are given representation in films. 

But the question of proper and accurate representation remains, and we must grapple with it. If there is a false or misrepresentation, there is a need to talk about it. Force diversity is not the issue; a false representation is a false representation. 

If a movie, for instance, makes a false claim about certain things, we must recognize it as such. Historical films and biographical films are primarily guilty. In art, especially in films, those things happen every day. 

The recent complaints about forced diversity are no exception. It might be overblown, but it has profound implications, which could undermine our success in fighting for inclusivity and diversity. 

The Importance of Diversity In The Workplace To Increase Productivity 

Diversity and inclusivity added to allure and glamor of Hollywood, mainly due to the influx of talented people previously marginalized and excluded. 

The film industry itself demonstrates how important workplace diversity is for productivity. Since making great strides for equality and inclusion, the film industry has made great leaps and bounds. That is in terms of profit and in making good quality content. 

That is because the industry has access to great minds, leading to technological innovations and producing content. Diversity broadens the base of available talent, which film production companies have put to great use. 

It is simple math; diversity and inclusivity mean more people available for work, guaranteeing a more extensive talent pool. A diverse group of people also means other ideas are up for consideration, leading to innovation. 

Why We Need More Than Buzzword To Address Forced Diversities 

If not addressed, the myth of forced diversity leads to accusations of forced diversity in other fields, such as in the workplace and schools. It can lead to a reaction in which hard-earned victories through affirmative action, such as mandatory quotas and the like, could be reversed. 

What we need is a proper diversity and inclusion strategy, one that is responsive for all. In this sense, the issue of forced diversity is a wake-up call. It forces all the stakeholders to reassess the strategy and ensure that the inclusion plan is for everybody. 

In debating forced diversities, we should go beyond the buzzword itself and go to the heart of the matter: the issue of continuing marginalization and discrimination in some sectors. Forced diversity is contentious because vestiges of oppression, exclusion, and discrimination remain.  

Planning and strategy of inclusion and diversity needs a holistic approach which involves most, if not every stakeholder. 

Some want to throw back the hands of time and bring back the old days. On the other hand, there are others who want to capitalize and profit from the fight for social justice by sacrificing accurate representation. The grave implication is that it might produce a reaction that could reverse all our successes. 

Then, part of the inclusion plan should be to clear the air and call a spade a spade. Errors and misrepresentations are possible; it is for that reason that you have film critics. Resorting to buzzwords harking back to the days of oppression is the last thing we need. 

How Can You Help with The Issue of Forced Diversity? 

Patently wrong things, misrepresented, and obvious errors of fact need to be recognized if there is a need for it. That is the best way to deal with the controversy of forced diversity. 

The truth is that it is contentious because there are still marginalized communities and oppressed minorities. The film remains a contested terrain for the oppressor and the oppressed, but we must never give the opponent ammunition in the fight. We need to be accurate and truthful too. 

Being level-headed and rational can go a long way, especially when discussing contentious matters. We must never lose sight of the goal of decreasing inequality, but we must also be fair and just. 

Conclusion 

Errors and misrepresentations in films can happen, precisely the reason why there are film critics, and we moviegoers must remain attentive.

In countries never racked by division, and equality or institutions are working for the equality of all, forced diversity is not much of an issue. The fact that we argue about it and that it is contentious implies that the acceptance of diversity has not taken root in some sectors. 

As such, we must continue fighting for greater inclusivity and diversity. The fight, however, does not imply a no holds barred, take no prisoners approach. We can do it while remaining calm and sensible, appealing to truth and reason. 

The accusation of forced diversity rings a bell to some people because they think there is a misrepresentation. But we must recognize that we might err ourselves. 

The best way to deal with forced diversity is to put things into perspective and context and argue our points through proper reasoning and truth. If proven mistaken, however, we must be honest about it. 

References

1. Diversity for Social Impact. (n.d.). Resources. Retrieved from https://diversity.social/resources/
2. Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, 94(7-8), 52-60. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail
3. Hunt, V., Layton, D., & Prince, S. (2015). Why diversity matters. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/why-diversity-matters
4. National Center for Women & Information Technology. (2016). The impact of gender diversity on technology business performance: Research summary. Retrieved from https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/impactgenderdiversitytechbusinessperformance_print.pdf
5. Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 181-209. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740